laptop configuration for video editing image
Manny
I'm planning on using the laptop with Adobe Premiere, Photoshop, and After Effects mostly for editing DSLR video and photographs. I need something that will be able to handle multiple HD video layers, some 3D rendering, music production, etc. Is this possible? NOTE: I'd prefer not to hack my video card but I can if I absolutely have to.
Answer
You need something with an extremely fast CPU and lots of RAM. Graphics card doesn't matter as much when it comes to everything you mentioned except 3D modeling. I suggest you look for a workstation-style build, and not a gaming build.
Something like this:
i7-38XXQM and above
16GB+ of RAM
SSD! Solid State Drives are very important if you want your programs and projects to open fast! I suggest either a hybrid drive or an all-out 256GB SSD.
Any graphics card over a GT630M or 7670M will do.
You need something with an extremely fast CPU and lots of RAM. Graphics card doesn't matter as much when it comes to everything you mentioned except 3D modeling. I suggest you look for a workstation-style build, and not a gaming build.
Something like this:
i7-38XXQM and above
16GB+ of RAM
SSD! Solid State Drives are very important if you want your programs and projects to open fast! I suggest either a hybrid drive or an all-out 256GB SSD.
Any graphics card over a GT630M or 7670M will do.
how much is a difference from usb 2 and firewire?
button
Before I spend 100 bucks on a firewire card for my laptop.
Other than speed is there really much of a difference that would affect quality using a USB rather than firewire?
Answer
Most digital video camera come with a Firewire connector so if you plan on downloading clips directly from it for digital editing, Firewire should be on the laptop.
In this case, I would say YES, Firewire (IEEE 1394) would be a valuable asset to you !
Now to correct some misconceptions, I present this: IEEE 1394 interface (AKA FireWire) versus Universal Serial Bus (AKA USB) - A little (short primer)
FireWire is NOT Apple's version of USB !
Apple (Firewire instigator) intended it to be a serial replacement for the parallel SCSI (Small Computer System Interface) bus while also providing connectivity for digital audio and video equipment while the consortium behind the creation of USB intended it to replace the multitude of connectors (serial and parallel ports) at the back of PCs, as well as to simplify software configuration of communication devices.
Speed Comparison between Firewire (400) and USB (2.0)
FireWire 400 can transfer data between devices at up to 400 Mbit/s half-duplex data rates (the actual transfer rate is 393.216 Mbit/s or 49.152 megabytes per second) while USB 2.0 transfer rate is 480 Mbit/s.
Although USB 2.0 nominally runs at a higher signaling rate (480 Mbit/s) than FireWire 400, data transfers over FireWire interfaces generally outperform similar transfers over USB 2.0 interfaces.
Typical highest USB transfers are 280 Mbit/s, with 240 Mbit/s being more typical.
This is caused by USB's reliance on the host-processor whereas FireWire delegates the same tasks to the interface hardware. For example, the FireWire host interface supports memory-mapped devices, which allows high-level protocols to run without loading the host CPU with interrupts and buffer-copy operations. Besides throughput, other differences are that it uses simpler bus networking, provides more power over the chain, more reliable data transfer, and uses less CPU resources.
So in short, despite the lower number of Mbit/s, Firewire is actually FASTER than USB.
Most digital video camera come with a Firewire connector so if you plan on downloading clips directly from it for digital editing, Firewire should be on the laptop.
In this case, I would say YES, Firewire (IEEE 1394) would be a valuable asset to you !
Now to correct some misconceptions, I present this: IEEE 1394 interface (AKA FireWire) versus Universal Serial Bus (AKA USB) - A little (short primer)
FireWire is NOT Apple's version of USB !
Apple (Firewire instigator) intended it to be a serial replacement for the parallel SCSI (Small Computer System Interface) bus while also providing connectivity for digital audio and video equipment while the consortium behind the creation of USB intended it to replace the multitude of connectors (serial and parallel ports) at the back of PCs, as well as to simplify software configuration of communication devices.
Speed Comparison between Firewire (400) and USB (2.0)
FireWire 400 can transfer data between devices at up to 400 Mbit/s half-duplex data rates (the actual transfer rate is 393.216 Mbit/s or 49.152 megabytes per second) while USB 2.0 transfer rate is 480 Mbit/s.
Although USB 2.0 nominally runs at a higher signaling rate (480 Mbit/s) than FireWire 400, data transfers over FireWire interfaces generally outperform similar transfers over USB 2.0 interfaces.
Typical highest USB transfers are 280 Mbit/s, with 240 Mbit/s being more typical.
This is caused by USB's reliance on the host-processor whereas FireWire delegates the same tasks to the interface hardware. For example, the FireWire host interface supports memory-mapped devices, which allows high-level protocols to run without loading the host CPU with interrupts and buffer-copy operations. Besides throughput, other differences are that it uses simpler bus networking, provides more power over the chain, more reliable data transfer, and uses less CPU resources.
So in short, despite the lower number of Mbit/s, Firewire is actually FASTER than USB.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: On a loose $1500 budget, what is the most productive configuration for a laptop intended for Adobe CS6?
Rating: 97% based on 975 ratings. 4,7 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 97% based on 975 ratings. 4,7 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment