Chock
HI,
Thank you very much for giving attention here. I am going to buy a PC very soon, I already have a (Core2duo 2.93 ghz 1st gen) Desktop PC and a Laptop (HP Pro-Book 4530s i5 2450m and 4 GB 1333mhz RAM)
I am a student and may be a fantastic freelancer :)
I work on various types of Video editing/rendering/producing projects. May you know both of my pc (that I have) is not capable to handle professional video editing, they crying when I put some 3D effects on my project on after effects CS6.
on my lapto its takes 50-80 minute to render a 5 minute 3D video (when only few 3D effects added).
Actually my target is to do only video editing with my new PC (that I want to by). I need a PC that will be the best on my budget. Well may you need to know my budget, but Its not fixed properly. But I listed/selected almost everything that need to make my PC better for my target task, but still having some confutation,
I JUST NEED YOUR RECOMMENDATION ABOUT WHICH "CPU" & "GPU" I NEED TO BYE.
the list is below
1__CPU: INTEL i7 3770k / AMD FX 8350 (I already checked this: http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-3770K-vs-AMD-FX-8350-Black-Edition)
2__GPU: NVDIA GTX 660 / 670 / 550 or RADEON HD 7950
3__MOTHERBOARD: GA-Z77X-UP5 TH (for t7) or ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0 / MSI 990FXA-GD80V2 ( for FX 8530)
[PLEASE SUGGGEST ME IF THERE ANY BETTER MOTHERBOARD FOR THIS CHIPS BUT NEED PCI GEN 3.0 WHEN MY CARD (gtx660 /670 IS PCI 3.0 SUPPORTED)].
4__RAM: Not sure about brand but 8 GB 1600 mhz.
5__HDD/SSD: WD 2 TB black/blue [which is best?] for storage and may be 80 GB HDD / 128 GB SSD for OS & apps.
6__Powersupply: May be Thermaltek [what to see when buying a PSU ?]
7__Cooler: may be water cooler is not available in the local market so need to buy air cooler (may be this type of : http://www.hersheng.com/sites/default/files/iceedgemini%20a_0.jpg) like "DC-IceEdge Mini" [is this enough for i7 or FX when I want to overclock about to 4.7 ghz ?]
8__MONITOR: Just want a very good looking monitor with IPS panel and may be 21-24 inch.
So,
you know up mentioned is my listing to make a kick ass video editing machine (not want same as hp or dell work stations I know this is not that's like :( )
So, PLEASE GYES AND GALS PLS HELP ME CHOOSE WHICH CPU AND GPU i SHOULD CHOOSE FROM MY LISTING? IF YOU THINK ABOUT THE SAME AMOUNT $$ I CAN GET BETTER CPU/GPU THEN PLEASE SUGGEST ME THAT TOO.
Hope you understand I need to know first that which one is best for video editing: i7 3770k or FX 8350
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
which card is best for (mainly 3D, I need to run after effects CS6 3D engine) video editing: GTX 660/670/550 or HD 7950
(you can suggest any under $350)
Then if you have time please suggest me more things that I asked upper.
Hope I will hear something tomorrow morning.
Thank you in advanced.
-
Chock
Answer
For video editing, the Core i7 3770K (and of course the GA-Z77X-UP5 motherboard)
The CPUBoss comparison is a little misleading. Just because AMD processors have a higher raw Ghz rating doesn't mean they're faster. Those numbers simply don't translate across different architectures- Intel CPUs are faster on a clock-for-clock basis. Even a 2.8Ghz Core i5 760 outperforms a 3.4Ghz Phenom II X4 965.
Let's look at real application performance instead:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6396/the-vishera-review-amd-fx8350-fx8320-fx6300-and-fx4300-tested/3
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/fx-8350-8320-6300-4300_7.html#sect0
Although the FX-8350 has more physical cores, Intel's more advanced and efficient core architecture emerges victorious in most instances. Moreover, the Core i7 & Z77 motherboard combination allows you to utilize Intel's proprietary Quick Sync, which was introduced with Sandy Bridge.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/9
With the Ivy Bridge Core i7 3770K, Quick Sync is even better:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5771/the-intel-ivy-bridge-core-i7-3770k-review/21
The GPU- that's an interesting choice. The Radeon HD 7950 is clearly the most powerful option, if you were building a gaming rig it's the slam-dunk winner.
But video editing doesn't require a really high-end graphics card, and there's generally more widespread support for Nvidia's CUDA than AMD's Stream among professional applications. So I might be tempted to go with the GTX 660 and save $100 to be used elsewhere in the build. I'm just not sure how much having the more powerful HD 7950 would really help what you're doing. If it turns out that Adobe's creative suite really benefits, then stick with the HD 7950 (or consider Nvidia's competing card the GTX 660 Ti, which is slightly less powerful)
An SSD would ONLY be useful as a boot drive. Due to the write cycle limit, SSDs are not well-suited to heavy-duty editing applications, and should NOT be used for temporary/scratch folders or your Windows paging file- that will shorten their lifespan.
Video editing goes more smoothly when your source and destination folders are on different physical drives, so no matter what I recommend dual HDDs of 1-2 TB capacity (even if that means skipping the SSD). Reducing your Windows startup time is less important than reducing encoding times.
On the PSU, definitely NOT Thermaltake. They're a mediocre brand when it comes to power supplies- some good units, some bad ones. Thermaltake and Cooler Master are hit-and-miss in the PSU department, they aren't elite brands like Corsair, Seasonic, Antec, XFX, Enermax, and Silverstone.
Here's a review of Thermaltake's TR2 RX 750W. Feel free to go through the whole thing but I'll just link the conclusion page. In a nutshell- avoid the TR2 line.
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Thermaltake-TR2-RX-750-W-Power-Supply-Review/902/9
For a CPU cooler, look for a Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO - it's the best bang/buck air cooler on the market.
Here's the head-to-head comparison between those two CPUs:
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/551?vs=697
For video editing, the Core i7 3770K (and of course the GA-Z77X-UP5 motherboard)
The CPUBoss comparison is a little misleading. Just because AMD processors have a higher raw Ghz rating doesn't mean they're faster. Those numbers simply don't translate across different architectures- Intel CPUs are faster on a clock-for-clock basis. Even a 2.8Ghz Core i5 760 outperforms a 3.4Ghz Phenom II X4 965.
Let's look at real application performance instead:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6396/the-vishera-review-amd-fx8350-fx8320-fx6300-and-fx4300-tested/3
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/fx-8350-8320-6300-4300_7.html#sect0
Although the FX-8350 has more physical cores, Intel's more advanced and efficient core architecture emerges victorious in most instances. Moreover, the Core i7 & Z77 motherboard combination allows you to utilize Intel's proprietary Quick Sync, which was introduced with Sandy Bridge.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/9
With the Ivy Bridge Core i7 3770K, Quick Sync is even better:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5771/the-intel-ivy-bridge-core-i7-3770k-review/21
The GPU- that's an interesting choice. The Radeon HD 7950 is clearly the most powerful option, if you were building a gaming rig it's the slam-dunk winner.
But video editing doesn't require a really high-end graphics card, and there's generally more widespread support for Nvidia's CUDA than AMD's Stream among professional applications. So I might be tempted to go with the GTX 660 and save $100 to be used elsewhere in the build. I'm just not sure how much having the more powerful HD 7950 would really help what you're doing. If it turns out that Adobe's creative suite really benefits, then stick with the HD 7950 (or consider Nvidia's competing card the GTX 660 Ti, which is slightly less powerful)
An SSD would ONLY be useful as a boot drive. Due to the write cycle limit, SSDs are not well-suited to heavy-duty editing applications, and should NOT be used for temporary/scratch folders or your Windows paging file- that will shorten their lifespan.
Video editing goes more smoothly when your source and destination folders are on different physical drives, so no matter what I recommend dual HDDs of 1-2 TB capacity (even if that means skipping the SSD). Reducing your Windows startup time is less important than reducing encoding times.
On the PSU, definitely NOT Thermaltake. They're a mediocre brand when it comes to power supplies- some good units, some bad ones. Thermaltake and Cooler Master are hit-and-miss in the PSU department, they aren't elite brands like Corsair, Seasonic, Antec, XFX, Enermax, and Silverstone.
Here's a review of Thermaltake's TR2 RX 750W. Feel free to go through the whole thing but I'll just link the conclusion page. In a nutshell- avoid the TR2 line.
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Thermaltake-TR2-RX-750-W-Power-Supply-Review/902/9
For a CPU cooler, look for a Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO - it's the best bang/buck air cooler on the market.
Here's the head-to-head comparison between those two CPUs:
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/551?vs=697
What Laptop is Best for Video Editing?
Sir_Knows_
I'm becoming more and more interested in video editing, so I personally would like to get a laptop(no matter what the price) that would both perform great for video editing and also for everyday needs(internet and typing). Any brand of laptop would be great! Thanks!
Answer
Buying a laptop is a complicated decision which will probably affect you daily for the next few years.
In addition to price and specs, you want to consider things such as ease-of-use, speed, reliability, stylish-design and tech-support.
Different people would have different opinions.
Therefore, I would recommend you to check ProCompare.com (http://www.procompare.com/top/Notebooks). They have a recommendation engine that ranks laptops and other tech products based on ratings and reviews from a community of trusted IT professionals. They also have a cool personalization slider that lets you personalize the results based on the criteria that are most important to YOU.
Hope you'll find this answer useful...
Buying a laptop is a complicated decision which will probably affect you daily for the next few years.
In addition to price and specs, you want to consider things such as ease-of-use, speed, reliability, stylish-design and tech-support.
Different people would have different opinions.
Therefore, I would recommend you to check ProCompare.com (http://www.procompare.com/top/Notebooks). They have a recommendation engine that ranks laptops and other tech products based on ratings and reviews from a community of trusted IT professionals. They also have a cool personalization slider that lets you personalize the results based on the criteria that are most important to YOU.
Hope you'll find this answer useful...
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: Which CPU & GPU is best for video editing ?
Rating: 97% based on 975 ratings. 4,7 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 97% based on 975 ratings. 4,7 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment